Reformed Environmentalist

Hi-ya Honchos.

So the message the other day about acting on your values came from reading an article called Confessions of a recovering environmentalist.  The article isn’t about self-affirmation. Its about the death of ‘environmentalism‘ and its a doozy. Well worth a read. The comments are too.

The author talks about how ‘environmentalism’ was once about humans living along side the earth, valuing it asthetically and as equally important as humans – an idea that almost seems absurd in more recent and popular discourse – but has now slipped into finding and justifying ways to maintain the lives we lead now.

 Now it seemed that environmentalism was not about wildness or ecocentrism or the other-than-human world and our relationship to it. Instead it was about (human) social justice and (human) equality and (human) progress and ensuring that all these things could be realized without degrading the (human) resource-base which we used to call nature back when we were being naïve and problematic. Suddenly, never-ending economic growth was a good thing after all: the poor needed it to get rich, which was their right.

The article is good in that it questions what we are all told is “good.” Is it our right to be ‘rich‘? Who has right to what? Are we living in the ideal world that everyone deserves? Would you go so far as to say the way we live is fundamentally wrong? Slightly misguided? Well intended? Fine?

Ideally there is a middle ground where we can all live happily, and perhaps more simply in a way that benefits the world. Can you think of a reason why we need to maintain the highest way of living that we have now? All the separating of plastic and glass won’t justify a wastefulness in other areas (like excessive driving). Do you feel it does or can?

Getting personal here, I really feel it is better to not buy a new phone, for example, when you have a perfectly good one. Or spend a little more and support a complany with a good reputation, rather than a bad one. In this culture the money we spend, or don’t spend, or where we spend speaks very loudly.

What do you do to make the world better? What do you wish/encourage others to do. In the end, perhaps is it all about action? Do you even think things need to change?


One thought on “Reformed Environmentalist

  1. What gives us the right to think that we get to do whatever we like to the environment, just because we “own it”?

    Recently I have been looking (a little) at Maori culture. The issue of contention that I remember when I was a teenager / more ignorant adult, was the issue of sea-beds and foreshores. People were getting angry that there were such strong quotas of sealife that they could not go over (prosecution would take place). Issues associated with sustainability and respecting the land actually went back a few generations before European settlers noticed it. Remember the humble Moa? (aka, the Giant Chicken / Big Bird, 200 years ago?). That was an animal which did not survive humans’ on desire to use resources. Maori responded to the use and abuse of resources by placing Tapu (or making something ‘sacred’) on certain resources, to make sure that they had enough to sustain their lives only. Furthermore, they returned any flax, any resources they used to the area (if they took too much).

    Fast Forward 200+ years.

    I think that one of the biggest issues on our horizons is the issue of the environment. We just hit several milestones – one, being that the entire globe has just hit 7, 000, 000, 000 people in its population. This means a rapid amount of waste is being produced by different people every day.
    One such issue has been the increase of E-waste, with technological advances, everyone needs the better, the brighter, the faster, the BEST possible processor / phone / techie thingy. Truth be told? You don’t.

    We have such a NEED for our own right to make up our minds, about, well, everything. I think that environmental issues will become adopted first by radicalists, idealists, students who are not apathetic, THEN the friends / families / communities of those people, THEN the politicians, THEN the skeptics. That means it starts with you people, making a choice to be contentious of the effect on the environment when and where you spend.

    I’ve rambled. Discuss any / all of the above? Miss Maia?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s